Manhattan Baby [DVD]

Posted by Notcot on Oct 17, 2010 in Cult Film |

Average Rating: 2.0 / 5 (4 Reviews)

<- Read More Buy Now for £12.99 (Best Price)

Tags: , , , , ,

4 Comments

Quackser
at 4:00 am

Review by Quackser for Manhattan Baby [DVD]
Rating: (3 / 5)
Most of Lucio Fulci’s horror movies seem to have been scripted according to a five year-old’s list of the Scariest Things In The World. In this case, it’s: Scorpions! Glowing eyes! Stuffed birds that attack you!

So plot is never really a strong point in these films. This is rarely a problem, as Fulci’s disregard for (or misunderstanding of) “standard” film storytelling belies wonky dubbing and usually unconvincing special effects to propel the viewer into the director’s signature unsettling netherworld. There’s a real misanthropy at work in his films too, which, when countered by the strong character-playing of Caitriona MacColl or David Warbeck creates a gonzo-poetic Life versus Death dynamic that really crackles.

Unfortunately neither of those actors feature in “Manhattan Baby” (although Martha Taylor seems to have been styled to resemble MacColl) so it’s a fairly one-sided battle as Fulci piles on the scorpions and splashes around the blood in a story that borrows from (among many others) “Rosemary’s Baby”, “The Awakening” and even, at one point (though I may be imagining this, but see if you can spot it) “Stalker”.

Taylor and the late Christopher Connelly (although still with “Bronx Warriors” and “The Atlantis Interceptors” in his future at this point)play the parents of a couple of genuinely creepy kids who seem to be possessed by an ancient Egyptian amulet. This is the kind of movie in which an “expert” will “study” such an amulet and declare that it means “evil”. Fine. Off we go.

But this is middling Fulci, made at the beginning of the end of his career, when he seemed to be trying to duplicate the unselfconscious dark wonder he brought to his work only a couple of years before. Any enjoyment to be got from “Manhattan Baby” probably depends on having an affection for his other, more fully-realised films and recognising the Fulci touches as the director tries in vain to conjure up the magic again.

The creepy kids- Brigitta Boccoli and Giovanni Frezza are probably the best value here. And it says something wonderful about the late great Italian exploitation film industry that, at age eight, Giovanni was playing his second role in a Fulci picture (the first being “The House By The Cemetery”) had already worked with Enzo G Castellari and had a couple of Lamberto Bava movies in his near future.


 
A. Griffiths
at 4:55 am

Review by A. Griffiths for Manhattan Baby [DVD]
Rating: (1 / 5)
I thought if I finally watched “Manhattan Baby” on DVD in widescreen rather than the poor full-screen video copies of it that were previously available, I’d be able to re-appraise it, but sadly, I still find that it’s among Lucio Fulci’s worst efforts. Fulci displays no evidence whatsoever in this movie that he knows what to shoot to make an interesting or suspenseful film. Half the time, he can find nothing worth putting in front of the lens except extreme close-ups of the actors eyes. Time and time again, the camera zooms in for lingering close-ups of the actors eyes, when there could have been – there must have been – so many other creative possibilities to choose from…did nobody point this out?

Anyway, whatever the artistic “vision” was supposed to be, the story goes roughly as follows: A husband and wife take their young daughter on a trip to Egypt, so that the husband can investigate an ancient tomb, and the wife can take pictures of all the tourist sights. The daughter, Suzy, wanders off alone and is ambushed by an Egyptian crone who gives her a mysterious amulet. (Cue the first of many extreme close-ups of eyes, and of the amulet, which also bears the design of an eye). At the same time the husband is blinded by a flash of blue light that emanates from a forbidden burial chamber that he has just discovered. Back in New York, the family is reunited with Suzy’s younger brother Tommy (played by the same child actor who played Bob in “House By The Cemetery” ), and their nanny. From this point on, Suzy begins to act strangely, wandering about the house (cue extreme close-ups of eyes), scaring the nanny by playing odd hide and seek games with Tommy (cue more extreme close-ups of eyes), and putting the amulet in various random places for some unfathomable kind of dramatic focus (cue more extreme close-ups of the amulet). While all this inconsequential nonsense is going on, the parents of the children drift in and out of the action, occasionally looking fraught or troubled at the goings on (cue more close ups of eyes, naturally). A few people die in unremarkable ways. The end of the film sees Suzy fall more perilously under the spell of the amulet (cue more close-ups of the amulet) and the struggle to save her by a mysterious antique shop owner who comes to visit Suzy and tells the worried family that he can undo the curse (cue more close-ups of eyes).

Watching this film is only slightly more fun than watching paint dry. Fulci seems to have entirely run out of ideas about how to make a film that is visually stimulating – there is nothing even approaching interesting on the screen for about 90% of the running time. Just endless talking heads and those never ending eye close-ups. The trademark gore scenes are all but absent, save for one right near the end when a character is attacked by stuffed birds. The slant that the birds are stuffed rather than alive – having supposedly been re-animated by the evil power – is quite a good one, but sadly you can see the wires carrying them around the room in EVERY SINGLE shot during the attack. At least there were some good old-school close ups of bloody flesh-pecking to wake me up at this stage, but the film was over an hour and twenty minutes through by this time…far too late for redeeming the movie as a whole.

The dubbing is also terrible, the worst I have seen for a long time. Especially of the children. When an instant photo turns out badly, Suzy exclaims chirpily “It’s a dud, defective stock!”…What the…? And when the parents ask where the babysitter has vanished to, young Tommy exlaims “She’s gone on a voyage!” A voyage? What 8 year old boy uses words like “voyage”? It’s almost a shame to see poor Giovanni Frezza, who appears to be an unselfconscious and lively child actor, crippled by such a hideous dubbed script. At least be thankful he does not have the same sounding voice he had in “The House by the Cemetery”, which similarly ruined his character. But the fault lies way beyond pinning this on lame performances (Although I would have loved to see Katherine MaColl take the role as the mother rather than the lacklustre Martha Taylor, and Christopher Connelly is equally forgettable as the father.). There is really nothing worth keeping your attention on the screen for. A passably attractive prologue filmed on location in Egypt soon gives way to the rest of the film almost entirely taking place in the family’s nondescript apartment. The antique shops looks like the set of the basement from “The House by the Cemetery” with just the cobwebs removed, and even the music is lifted from previous Fulci films, most notably some very recogniseable music from “The Beyond”. How any self-respecting director can just re-use a score that was (one would presume) originally composed to match the story and atmosphere of one of his previous films is beyond me.

The plot, as usual, does not serve up anything cohesive to the audience, so without any arresting visuals or jolting gore scenes, watching the film is a pretty boring experience. There’s no climactic ending, just a rather tame suggestion of the cyclical recurrence of the evil curse, the origins or intentions of which are never explained anyway during the entire plot. And as if you hadn’t had enough by now, the film closes with – yes you guessed it – more extreme close ups of eyes and another, final close up of the wretched amulet, not that the sight of it produced any sense of dread throughout the whole dreary story. I will allow that there have been reports of imposed conditions behind the making of “Manhattan Baby” that lead Fulci to make some severe compromises, but he has to take responibility for what he delivered to his audience, and he should be ashamed of the undeniable weakness of the end result.


 
P.L
at 5:30 am

Review by P.L for Manhattan Baby [DVD]
Rating: (3 / 5)
Manhattan Baby is an ok but confusing effort from Fulci before his carrer went downhill, it has very little gore and Fabio Frizzi’s score sounds like he couldnt be bothered. It is worth a look if you are a Fulci fan but if you are a newcomer go and buy The Beyond or The House by the Cemetery instead.

Shameless have give this movie its long overdue uk dvd release in an excellent 2.35:1 transfer enhanced for 16:9 tvs. The only extras are some trailers


 
Pob75
at 6:16 am

Review by Pob75 for Manhattan Baby [DVD]
Rating: (1 / 5)
Nothing to add to the review above – very comprehensive!

This is BAD. Possibly a tiny bit better than Aenigma by Fulci but they are both awful. AVOID


 

Reply

Copyright © 2024 Notcot All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek. Site by I Want This Website. | Privacy Policy.