Sennheiser PX200 Black Closed Mini Headphone Black

Posted by Notcot on Apr 26, 2010 in Portable Sound & Vision |

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments

M. A. Burgess
at 12:58 am

I’ve had a pair of these for a year and they’re pretty much unbeatable. A good well-balanced sound, they are semi-closed back in style with enough bass for you not to bother with the bass-boost feature on your player. Not thick and heavy as some closed back types are, they work well with all music types from metal to vocals to classical strings and jazz. They fit my head (that’s saying something!) and have a typically sennheiser soft pad fit to the ear, VERY comfortable for listening over long periods. Also, not only can no-one else tell what you’re listening to, they also do a great job of reducing external white noise so are right at home in the typical public-transport environment of the mp3 listener and as a result make listening at low volumes a pleasure.

However…….the universal joint ‘pins’ on the drive units are made of plastic. One of mine sheared off recently, looks like a weak point in their construction. Be careful how you store them, don’t just throw them in a bag. I will still be buying another pair though.
Rating: 5 / 5


 
dan
at 2:25 am

i never write reviews but what prompted me was the the large number of reviews from other websites which stated that the px100 was superior to the px200. i currently own hd555 and i love the flat sound it gives which allows me to crank up the volume without annoying or hurting my ears. i was looking for a pair of portable headphones similar to the sound of the 555 which i could listen to for several hours without listener fatigue.

i had tested the px100 and was satisfied with the sound. on the day that i went to purchase it the shop asked if i wanted to try the px200. i tested the 2 headphones side by side for 30 minutes. even though i was satisfied with the sound of the px100 i decided to buy the px200 for the following reasons:

1. the bass is better

2. the midrange and treble are clearer

3. it is a lot more efficent. on some tracks i had to crank up the

volume to full on the px100 but i only had to turn the volume on at

3/4 on the px200 to achieve the same volume

4. it isolates sound

5. even though the sound is less flat than the px100 it does not give

me any listening fatigue like i get from cheap headphones

if i had not listened to the px200 i would have been more than satisfied with the px100. but after having tested the px200 i decided to buy it.

i hope this is helpful.
Rating: 5 / 5


 
Anonymous
at 4:07 am

Spent a long time investigating headphones for my new iPod after accepting that while the white buds are trendsville, they weren’t going to give me the best quality music. Wanted ‘phones that would cut out a bit of outside noise, wouldn’t disturb other people on the train, would be portable and practical, and, most importantly, would sound very good. And I’m no audio expert, so I didn’t want to spend loads of money until I got a sense of how good headphones can be. Read dozens of reviews and settled on buying the PX200s, which I’ve now had two days.

Once you get inside the plastic packaging, you find they come in this plastic case that, while I appreciate they do fit in very ingeniously, I almost laughed because I realised I’m never going to get organised to spend time putting them in and out of the case: it’s a very snug fit. It took me a few moments to figure out how to get them out! Once out they fold out to headphone size very easily, and while not feeling amazingly rugged, the build quality is very good. I think I’m going to be happy just folding them up, wrapping the wire round loosely, and keeping them semi-safe in my bag or (large) pocket. Just for stats purposes, they have a standard 3.5mm jack, and the cable is 1.4m according to the box. Length of cable seems fine to me.

Put the headphones on and they’re very comfortable. Adjusting the height is quite easy (I have quite a big head), and they sit quite comfortably over hours of usage, the oft quoted “didn’t realise I had them on” and so forth.

Plugged them into my iPod and immediately noticed two things. First, the overall sound quality is wonderful, and I realised how much those iPod buds muffle and blend the sounds (relatively speaking of course). Instruments can be picked out really easily, the stereo positioning is much clearer, and you hear things in music you just never noticed before. I know I’m at a low-ish price point (relatively) with these headphones, and I know more expensive ones could be a step up again, but I’m really impressed. I can now pick out much more recording detail in my music, and I’m sure I’m going to try re-sampling my music at a higher rate as I can now tell when the encoding quality isn’t high enough.

Second, I must admit I did notice immediately that the bass was much weaker than with the iPod buds. Some reviews I’ve read said you need to put the ‘phones lower on your ears to get the bass, but I was doing that. They just seemed to lack the bass power, or perhaps the iPod buds were overdoing the bass? Anyway, I also read about ‘breaking in’ headphones (which I understand is a debated issue) so last night I plugged them into my stereo and left them playing in my sock drawer overnight. I must admit, doing a comparison today, the bass seems to have picked up nicely. I think I read that break-in can take much longer, so it’s my belief they’ll keep improving. Other things I’ve read about headphones in general seem to bear that out. Also, I guess that the iPod’s headphone power may not be beefy enough to give these ‘phones what they deserve, so if I start getting more picky about it I may investigate a pre-amp (or whatever it’s called) for the ‘phones, though I don’t want to carry extra gizmos around. Anyway, it was my perceived improvement in bass from my overnight break-in that made this rating 5 stars rather than 4 stars.

Overall, the PX200 headphones meet my criteria almost perfectly. On the (overwhelming) plus side, music is crisp and clear, they are very portable, and very comfortable to wear. On the minus side, the bass power is debatable, but there seem several factors involved, I’ve only had them two days, and the ‘breaking in’ thing seems to be working for me, so it’s not fair to knock them down on it.

Definitely worth the purchase.
Rating: 5 / 5


 
Mr Ulster
at 5:13 am

What a wonder piece of audio kit! This will vastly improve your enjoyment of whatever quality playback device you use–cheap or state-of-the-art.

Sennheiser is the standard headphone supplier for top DJs and recording professionals, and for good reason. What they have produced here is the best set of portable headphones for us commuters and travelers, and one that won’t make us look like audiophile geeks–they are just the right size.

Yet it is the superb quality of the bass and tones that make it worth paying that bit more. I can’t use the technical language to best describe this fantastic output, but you know it when you hear it.

I’m sure that there are other headphones with better sound, but I doubt they feature the compactness of the PX200.

Within the Sennheiser PX range, I would recommend the PX200. The PX250 is one better, with noise cancellation features (great for noisy plane and train journeys), but are twice the price. The PX100 cost a few quid less, but the PX200 are just that little bit more solid and dynamic.
Rating: 5 / 5


 

I have owned a pair of these headphones for nearly 2 years. I bought them to replace a much more expensive pair of Sony headphones and they are just as good. I have travelled with them all over the world and they haven’t broken yet. I think you would have to spend some serious money to get better. I can easily tell the difference between my CD palyer and iPod with these phones. The extra detail and imaging that you can hear from the CD is easily handled by these phones.

I can’t fault them and they come in a well thought out carrying case too.
Rating: 5 / 5


 

Reply

Copyright © 2024 Notcot All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek. Site by I Want This Website. | Privacy Policy.